
January 10, 2026 • Baseline Assessment • Neuralytica Tennis v1.2
80/100
Solid
91/100
High
11 pts
Moderate
Biggest opportunity: elite reaction speed leverage. It shows up as elite-tier reaction time (215ms, 91st percentile) that can be weaponized through aggressive court positioning on returns and dominant early-set baseline play.
Build attention persistence into late-session rallies—the athlete can react lightning-fast, but focus drifts by set 3, and that's where matches get lost.
Fast scan — strengths vs needs work (within-athlete).
Strengths
Needs Work
What it is: How fast you usually read the ball—and how often you have slow spikes. (Spike = one unusually slow read.)
Why it matters: Spikes make you late to the ball and force rushed, off-balance contact.
Forehand-Side
Backhand-Side
Read speed is world-class: 215ms peak puts you in the 91st percentile for 18-year-olds in competitive tennis—elite territory. Consistency is excellent; both forehand and backhand sit within 17ms of each other, showing balanced visual attention across the court.
Coach: The athlete can trust their court vision. On return-of-serve, tighten your court positioning because your reads will let you react from aggressive lines. On rallies, use your speed advantage to dominate the baseline early before fatigue sets in.
What it is: Peak = your fastest clean read today. Typical = what you produce most of the time.
Why it matters: The gap is proven thinking speed you're not accessing consistently.
Choice RT | Open + Aware trials
The gap is tight: only 30ms separates best from typical, which is excellent consistency. You don't have to play the perfect point to win—your typical read speed is fast enough to dominate rallies.
Coach: goal is repeatability—the goal in matches is to stay in that 240–250ms zone; when you're above 300ms, you're tired or distracted, and that's when breaks happen.
After a Wrong Read
What it is: How fast you override the first plan and commit to the correct one.
Why it matters: Hesitation is where weak returns happen and your body ends up in bad positions.
Example: Wrong read on serve direction → re-commit
Commit Speed Under Conflict
Accuracy Under Complexity
The speed is excellent: only 13ms slower on hard decisions, which is elite-level conflict resolution. The accuracy trade-off is the story: the athlete sacrifices precision to stay fast (93% → 75% accuracy). In match situations, this can show up as aggressive forehands when a defensive backhand is needed.
Coach: Your decision-making speed is world-class, but you're rushing your conclusions. On high-stakes points (break point, match point), slow down the decision slightly and prioritize 'right' over 'fast.' Your speed is already fast enough; add precision and you're unbeatable.
Does Thinking Speed Stay Sharp Late?
What it is: Tracks how read + decision performance changes from early → mid → late.
Why it matters: When this drops, late errors rise and movement gets compromised.
Degradation onset
Mid-session
Drift severity
Mild-Moderate
The athlete gets noticeably slower late: +31ms drift suggests mental fatigue kicking in around the midpoint of session/match. This is the moment to lock in focus, or the final set becomes a disaster.
Coach: Your body is fine (recovery metrics are excellent), but your mind checks out around set 2. Start implementing focus rituals at 1-1 in set 2 (every 3 points: breathe, look at the court, commit to your next point). Don't wait until you're down in set 3 to try to refocus.
Racket Side vs Other Side
What it is: How evenly both sides contribute as the session goes on.
Why it matters: When the gap widens late, the racket side tends to overwork.
Symmetry Index | Scale 0–100
The athlete starts with perfect bilateral symmetry but loses left-side stability late in session. This is a yellow flag: if it persists in future sessions, it predicts shoulder/wrist overload on the dominant (right) side.
Coach: Make equal training for forehands and backhands a non-negotiable rule. If you do 50 forehands in a session, do 50 backhands too. Right now you're doing way more forehands, and the left side is paying the price. Equal reps = equal durability.
Does the Body Match What the Brain Intends?
What it is: How well execution matches intended control across the session.
Why it matters: When this drops, mechanics slip even if effort stays high.
The athlete's brain stays connected to the body well, even under fatigue. Alignment only drops to 73/100 late, which is still functional. The decline is driven by left-side motor fatigue, not a coordination issue.
Coach: Your timing stays clean throughout the session, so trust your fundamental strokes. If you're making errors late, it's not a mechanics breakdown; it's a focus/recovery breakdown. Fix the mental side and the mechanics will re-stabilize.
Baseline: Calm vs Strain Today
What it is: A snapshot of how regulated vs strained the nervous system is today.
Why it matters: Context for interpreting late-session drift—not a primary driver.
This is one of the athlete's superpowers: HRV of 644ms is genuinely elite, meaning the nervous system has exceptional reserve capacity. The athlete can stay calm under pressure and recover instantly from adversity.
Coach: Your nervous system is built for pressure tennis. Tiebreaks, match points, facing break points—these are situations where your body will stay calm when your opponent is panicking. Lean into this advantage. Develop mental skills (visualization, breathing protocols) that complement your natural physiology.
Performance Degradation Signals
Mechanical / Injury-Relevant Signals
Recommended Protocol Categories
Focus areas and what to track for drift improvement.
Lock in attentional consistency across all three sets; eliminate the +31ms late-session RT drift and the mental fatigue that causes it.
Daily 10-minute attention-anchor drill: Coach feeds 20 consecutive points; athlete calls out a focus cue on each point ("split," "watch," "breathe," "track the ball"). Progress from fed points to match-simulation points; add tiebreak scoring to create match pressure.
Late-session RT drift reduces from +31ms to <15ms. Match footage analysis shows minimal increase in unforced errors in set 3 vs. set 1.
Equalize left/right motor workload to prevent left-side motor fatigue and chronic right-side overuse injury.
3x/week, 15-minute bilateral motor balance session. Equal rep forehands and backhands: 50 forehands, then 50 backhands in same session (maintain 1:1 ratio). Video analysis: Check for compensatory patterns (left-side reaching, right-side dominance, asymmetric footwork).
Post-task bilateral motor balance gap reduces from 1.18→0.5 within 3 weeks. No compensatory movement patterns visible on video analysis.
Fix the speed-accuracy trade-off; teach the athlete to maintain tactical precision even when tired and tempted to "just go for it."
3x/week, 20-minute precision-under-speed drills. Graduated difficulty rally drills: Level 1 (simple court geometry, one decision point) → Level 3 (complex court geometry, 3+ decision points per rally). Point awarded only for correct tactical decision + execution, not just hitting the ball in.
Stroop incongruent accuracy improves from 75%→>85%. Match video analysis shows tactical decision correctness >80% even in set 3.
See top of dashboard for the primary takeaway.
Bottom line: Ryan Hung is an elite 18-year-old with world-class reaction speed (215ms peak, 91st percentile) and exceptional mental resilience (644ms HRV, 95th percentile recovery capacity). His readiness for competitive tennis is high (80/100). The primary development edges are attention persistence in late sets (+31ms drift) and bilateral motor balance (left-side motor fatigue). With focused training on attention anchors, bilateral symmetry, and decision precision, the athlete can narrow the access gap from 11 to 5 points and compete at the highest levels consistently.